<body>

Updates

 

Wind Power Disadvantages

In a section of its website titled "Wind Powering America" the US Department of Energy is actively promoting properly sited industrial wind power generating plants. Tucked away deep in the website under a pile of prowind material is the following disclaimer:

Wind power must compete with conventional generation sources on a cost basis. Depending on how energetic a wind site is, the wind farm may or may not be cost competitive. Even though the cost of wind power has decreased dramatically in the past 10 years, the technology requires a higher initial investment than fossil-fueled generators.

The major challenge to using wind as a source of power is that the wind is intermittent and it does not always blow when electricity is needed. Wind energy cannot be stored (unless batteries are used); and not all winds can be harnessed to meet the timing of electricity demands.

Good wind sites are often located in remote locations, far from cities where the electricity is needed.

Wind resource development may compete with other uses for the land and those alternative uses may be more highly valued than electricity generation.

Although wind power plants have relatively little impact on the environment compared to other conventional power plants, there is some concern over the noise produced by the rotor blades, aesthetic (visual) impacts, and sometimes birds have been killed by flying into the rotors. Most of these problems have been resolved or greatly reduced through technological development or by properly siting wind plants.

Emphases added. Over the past year we've carefully noted and weighed all of the concerns expressed so clearly by the Department of Energy and have come to the informed conclusion that the problem in Cohocton has to do with proper siting. The plans submitted by UPC Wind - and the provisions of Local Law #2 of 2006 that was written to accommodate the developer's needs - place industrial wind turbines too close to dwellings, roads, and the property lines of nonleaseholders. It's as simple as that.

Labels:

 

for this post

 
Anonymous Anonymous Says:

avsome!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
 
Anonymous Faith Says:

I do not see why people both protesting against wind plants when some of the alternatives involve destroying the Earth.

 
 
Blogger Bill Says:

Sorry, Faith. You have apparently stumbled on our website and haven't read any of it yet, including the 2007 post you've commented on. Briefly, wind power is a 2-edged sword (some would say a very dull one) in the battle for clean, reliable energy that can actually cause more harm than good when improperly developed and sited. Please read our website in more depth and then return with a more nuanced set of comments. Thanks!

 

Leave a Reply